<span>In a common law system, judges are obliged to make their rulings as consistent as reasonably possible with previous judicial decisions on the same subject. The Constitution accepted most of the English common law as the starting point for American law. Situations still arise that involve rules laid down in cases decided more than 200 years ago. Each case decided by a common law court becomes a precedent, or guideline, for subsequent decisions involving similar disputes. These decisions are not binding on the legislature, which can pass laws to overrule unpopular court decisions. Unless these laws are determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, they preempt the common law precedent cases. Judges deciding cases are bound by the new law, rather than the precedent cases.</span>
Popular Sovereignty is your answer.
Hope this is helpful! Have a good one.
Both created strong sectional differences. The tariff sectioned out the south from the north. Slavery divided African Americans and other races from Caucasians.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I just finished the test :)
Hope this helps :3
Answer:
c
Explanation:
He had more respect for states' right than Lincoln
Andrew Jackson was keen on the Jeffersonian tradition and thus respected states' rights to a greater extent than Lincoln. He accepted the 1833 compromise put forward by Clay regarding the tariffs.
