1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nirvana33 [79]
3 years ago
9

Please help me and answer de question

History
1 answer:
vlada-n [284]3 years ago
4 0

The differences between the Federalists and the Antifederalists are vast and at times complex. Federalists’ beliefs could be better described as nationalist. The Federalists were instrumental in 1787 in shaping the new US Constitution, which strengthened the national government at the expense, according to the Antifederalists, of the states and the people. The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the US Constitution, but they never organized efficiently across all thirteen states, and so had to fight the ratification at every state convention. Their great success was in forcing the first Congress under the new Constitution to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the antifederalists felt the Constitution violated.


You might be interested in
What was the name of the general that led the Nazi forces in the Battle of El Alamein?
Luba_88 [7]
The name of the general that led the Nazi forces in the Battle of El Alamein was "<span>b. General Rommel," although it should be noted that he had help from Italian forces. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Why have Western influences had a major impact all over the world?
Harman [31]
There are several reasons why Western influences had a major impact all over the world, but the main reason is that they were more advanced in terms of weapons and technology, meaning they could more easily conquer other lands. 
6 0
3 years ago
What is one example of mixed culture between the Europeans and the Natives?
Advocard [28]
Salad bowl they call it that because of the mixed cultures
3 0
4 years ago
A potential cost for a government leader using a cost-benefit analysis is
irinina [24]
A potential cost for a government leader using a cost-benefit analysis is that the leader will fail to consider all the variables that will contribute to the outcome of whatever he or she is planning, since it is often hard to anticipate all possible scenarios in such an analysis. 
4 0
3 years ago
The Munich Pact did which of the
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

i think it B sorry if im wrong tho

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Events leading to the German surrender included all of the following except:
    10·2 answers
  • The only parallel not found in Psalm 100 is the climactic parallel. <br> True <br> False
    13·2 answers
  • How does a budget and saving increase your ability to purchase items you want or need over time?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following policies led to desegregation? fourteenth amendment fifteenth amendment immigration reform act civil righ
    7·2 answers
  • How did slaves who were still on the plantations during the war help the Union cause? 1) They prayed for the war to end. 2) They
    6·2 answers
  • Please Help me ASAP!! I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLIEST!!! Using complete sentences, explain how American Indians felt about the land a
    12·2 answers
  • Who became involved in the financial support of railroads when private investment proved
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·1 answer
  • This is an example of which of the following principles of US government?
    12·1 answer
  • What is one social effect of the Francis Cabot Lowell system?​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!