Answer: 1.The first part was unnecessary and the second part had words that were redundant
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues.
Explanation:
1. The first part was unnecessary, since it was transitional phrases. The second part had words that were redundant. For example, you don't need the re in front of duplicate and with the word again. Or office in government with voting,
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues. The motto less is more pertains to this sentence.
The verb would be turn. If not turn then remind<span />
<span>The pilot initially wanted to save the girl and disobey the law since he left the need to allow her to see her brother one more time. However , the mission he was carrying out would be doomed and the people who needed the medical supplies would die and that would be a great tragedy.</span>
The answer to this question is : There is no end to the logical fallacies that he has shared with us today. In fact, I would imagine that nothing in this speech was factually credible.
