1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pantera1 [17]
3 years ago
7

Paleoanthropologists have found stone tool marks on Homo erectus bones, and this bit of information has been spun on TV as “cann

ibal hominids.” A valid criticism of this sensationalistic conclusion is:
History
1 answer:
Tanya [424]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The stone tool marks on Homo Erectus bones indicate that flesh was removed from the bone,but it is unclear whether to consume it or not.  

Explanation:      

According to the Paleoanthropologists, cannibalism among the hominids occurred about 800,000 years ago. There is no single explanation to state the reason for cannibalism among the Homo Erectus bones. The killing of the people may be related to defending themselves from the neighboring territory groups or to get nutritional value from the flesh.

You might be interested in
The inventions of paper, the plow, and the wheelbarrow during the Han dynasty contrībuted most directly to the-
Marianna [84]

Answer:

3

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Germany was finally united under the control of a __________.
Yuri [45]
Prussia

Step-by-step explanation
7 0
2 years ago
Which event occurred first? 1. Civil was breaks out between the Reds and the Whites. 2.A communist government forms the USRR. 3.
aliya0001 [1]
Tsar Nicholas II gives up the throne after a coup led by Lenin and the Bolshevik party.
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these BEST describes an important action taken by the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb? A) his conversion to Buddhism resulting
Archy [21]
The answer is C) <span>his lack of religious toleration caused widespread dissatisfaction with the majority of the population
</span>

Unlike his predecessors who were sensitive in ruling a largely Hindu population, Aurangzeb was seen as a more 'religious' leader who wanted to impose some of his own beliefs on his subjects.

However, in reality many historians actually dispute this. While he did destroy some Hindu temples, the number is often exaggerated and it should be noted that he also destroyed mosques.


<span></span>
8 0
3 years ago
What is the best way to describe a Gregorian chant
Papessa [141]
<span>Musical arrangement sung in harmony</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Muslim scholars were very skilled in the field of astronomy and developed a calendar that was quite accurate. Which of the follo
    9·1 answer
  • What country controlled Korea during World War II?
    13·2 answers
  • Many European countries competed with each other to add new territory to their empires in the late nineteenth and early twentiet
    7·2 answers
  • How many of the world’s 20 largest cities are located in Western Europe?
    6·1 answer
  • ASAP This society was matrilineal. Clan members could not marry each other because they were all blood related on the mother’s s
    6·1 answer
  • What did the near extinction of the buffalo means for the plains indians
    10·1 answer
  • What strategic objective contributed to President Abraham Lincoln's decision to issue the Emancipation Proclamation?
    6·2 answers
  • N colonial America, who were the Sons of Liberty?
    11·1 answer
  • In your own words, please explain the difference between Republicanism and Federalism.
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Napoleonic Wars contribute to revolutions across South America?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!