Answer:
C
I hope it helps, sry if it doesn't!
I don't rly know how to explain it tho
Explanation:
Answer:
d.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the correct steps that are used by the FASB in developing GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) would be the following: issuing a discussion memorandum, issuing an exposure draft, and issuing a statement of principle. This collection of accounting rules was then adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Answer:
13.86%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the flotation-adjusted (net) cost of its new common stock
Using this formula
Cost of new common stock(re) = [d1 / stock price (1-flotation cost)] +g
Let plug in the formula
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36 / 33.35 (1 – 0.065)]+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36 / 33.35 (0.935)]+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36/31.182)+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)=0.04361+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)=0.1376*100
Cost of new common stock(re)=13.76%
Therefore the flotation-adjusted (net) cost of its new common stock will be 13.76%
Answer:
55.58
Explanation:
Data provided in the question;
Initial demand per month, Q₁ = 3
Final demand per month, Q₂ = 5
Initial price, P₁ = $33,200
Final price, P₂ = $33,500
Now,
elasticity of demand using midpoint method is calculated as :
= 
or
= 
on substituting the respective values, we get
= 
or
= 
or
= 
= 55.58
Answer: No.
Explanation:
This is a Perfectly Competitive market and that means that you are a price taker who maximises output at a point where Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost ( MR = MC). As costs have gone up, it simply means that for the conditions to be satisfied, you need to produce less at the factory in Connecticut.
That does not mean that you have to produce more at the Massachusetts plant because it is already producing at capacity and increasing the marginal cost would violate the MR=MC rule as you have no control over the price so you cannot change Marginal Revenue. It is therefore better to keep the production level at the Massachusetts plant unchanged.
