Minimum sentencing laws disproportionately affected <u>African Americans </u>because powder cocaine was typically consumed by<u> people of color. </u>
<h3>What was the result of minimum sentencing laws?</h3>
Marginalized groups such as African Americans were more prone to taking powder cocaine which flooded their neighborhoods.
As a result, the minimum sentencing laws that came with possession of powder cocaine saw a lot of African Americans thrown into jail.
Find out more on minimum sentencing laws at brainly.com/question/27128925.
I am for the 7th Amendment because I believe it helps make sure a trial is unbiased. Lawyers from both sides are able to reject and accept people on the Jury to balance out the trial so potentially all of the jurors are unbiased. It also helps filter out less important court cases because a jury give both side more than one opinion on the matter that is on trial.
The answer is True
Explanation: The main purpose of the reform agenda of the late 1970s was to divert the handling of status offenses from a criminal to a noncriminal setting.
Even so, a relatively large group of Chinese immigrated to the United States between the start of the California gold rush in 1849 and 1882, when federal law stopped their immigration.
With the onset of hard economic times in the 1870s, European immigrants and Americans began to compete for the jobs traditionally reserved for the Chinese. With economic competition came dislike and even racial suspicion and hatred. Such feelings were accompanied by anti-Chinese riots and pressure, especially in California, for the exclusion of Chinese immigrants from the United States. The result of this pressure was the Chinese Exclusion Act, passed by Congress in 1882. This Act virtually ended Chinese immigration for nearly a century.
Explanation:I tried hope this might give you insight ❤️
Because of British seizure of American ships and because of impressment of American seamen. :) I hope this helps!
