Answer:
Explanation:
Remark
Let's look at the two that you can eliminate without much worry. B and C are not going to say much about ecofriendly technologies.
It's between the New Science Lab and A record of Operational Data. The Operational Data might given you a hint about the need to reduce costs, but it won't say much about how to do it.
I would pick D. The science lab has the best chance of employing alternate ways of looking for cost control using ecofriendly technologies. It is a lab after all, and that is the first place one should seek the most modern ideas.
France came into conflict with Great Britain in the early 1700s over control of the Ohio River Valley. France and Great Britain both wanted to control the valley, so they went to war. This was called the French and Indian War.
atomic bombs is your best answer
The atomic bomb didn't make the Ally leaders worry at all, but they were looking for an alternative from invading Japan, which would have costed thousands of lives, and trillions of dollars. Instead, the atomic bomb was the best solution, even with radiation fallout.
hope this helps
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A) Effective Military Leadership
B) Intervention from Britain and France
C) The fighting skill of Southern males
D) Its ability to fight on its own soil
E) Its belief that it was defending its way of life
And the correct answer is:
B) Intervention from Britain and France
Explanation:
The Confederacy was an important supplier of cotton to Europe, including Britain and France. The Confederate leadership believed that Britain and France would eventually intervene in their favour once the cotton supply went down because of the war.
Unfortunately for the Confederacy, this never happenned because Europe got the cotton it needed from other countries such as Egypt and India. Besides, the fact that the Confederacy supported slavery also prevented France and Britain from supporting them, because in both countries, slavery was unpopular.
