1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rom4ik [11]
3 years ago
12

5. What did the Indian Removal Act do?

History
2 answers:
photoshop1234 [79]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders.

Explanation:

velikii [3]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native tribes for the removal

Explanation: look at the answer it tells you xD

You might be interested in
When did the European slave trade out of Africa arise and expand
avanturin [10]
I believe that it is D
5 0
2 years ago
List and explain two of the key actions to expand the voting franchise in the second half of the twentieth century.
Eddi Din [679]

Answer:

You have to first find a subway and then when you do buy all the sandwiches on the menu

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
According to the peace treaty, what was the new United States border to the West?
Alina [70]
The rocky mountains                                                                                                 
3 0
3 years ago
S the judicial branch the least dangerous branch of the three (i.e. legislative, executive, and judicial)?
lord [1]
In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton said that the Judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest of the three branches because it had "no influence over either the sword or the purse, ...It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment." Federalist No. 78 quotes Montesquieu<span>: "Of the three powers [...], the judiciary is next to nothing." There was little concern that the judiciary might be able to overpower the political branches; since Congress controlled the flow of money and the President the military, courts did not have nearly the same clout from a constitutional design standpoint. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was NOT a reason for the United States going to war with Britain?
serg [7]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the term natural increase mean in describing a population
    14·1 answer
  • A woman named Harriet Miller comes before a judge in a pretrial hearing. She's charged with stealing thousands of dollars. She p
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the guillotine regarded as a humane way to execute criminals
    7·1 answer
  • What happened at the 1968 Democratic national convention in Chicago​
    9·1 answer
  • The Senate will be seated by state, helping small states, while the House of Representatives will be seated by population, helpi
    5·1 answer
  • How did the political structure of<br> the African continent change<br> between 1880 and 1914?
    6·2 answers
  • Who settled veterans and the poor of the cities on the unused land of the empire
    12·2 answers
  • Decribe the natural resources in North America. Due to these natural resources what types of goods can North America create? 40
    15·1 answer
  • HELP HELP HELP HELP NOW
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think the people of Italy, Germany, and Japan listed to and followed radicals like Mussolini and Hitler?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!