1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xenn [34]
3 years ago
13

Why is Magellan not worth defending?

History
1 answer:
mash [69]3 years ago
8 0
Magellan wasn't worth defending because he burnt down a village and he killed people. he was also bad to his fleet. he yelled at them and forced them to eat food that was bad for them and has been sitting there for days. So those are a few reasons to why he didn't deserve someone defending him. <br />
You might be interested in
What was one of the consequences for the supreme court that resulted in the defeat of the confederacy during the civil war?
dmitriy555 [2]
It was death they would die

8 0
3 years ago
I led Apache raids on settlements on both sides of the Arizona-Mexico border for years. I was captured in 1886 and my people mov
natka813 [3]

Answer: Geronimo

Explanation: I hope this helps :)

6 0
2 years ago
What does the country say concerning the status of free blacks living in the United States?
Phoenix [80]

The correct answer is D) They are no citizens and they have no right to petition in Court.

<em>What the Court said concerning the status of free blacks living in the United States is that “they are no citizens and they have no right to petition in Court.” </em>

In the Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sanford of March 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that Scott was not entitled to his freedom. Scott had lived in a state that supported slavery but he was sold to an owner that lived in a non-slavery state. The Court decision was that African Americans were not citizens of the United States.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the two major regional versions of christianity part? how significant was the split?
Goshia [24]
<span>Doctrinally, the split between the division of Christianity had to do with the nature of the deity. As a matter of historical causation, however, it is difficult to overlook the fact that the split in Christianity mirrored the concomitant division of the Roman Empire into Eastern and Western halves. As the halves of the empire grew further apart militarily and economically, so too did they grow further apart culturally and religiously.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What did europeans begin to view africa as a source
GenaCL600 [577]
They Europeans believed that they could use the Africans as slaves.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the 1735 trial of John Peter Zenger?
    11·1 answer
  • The following events show how new technologies changed American society. Drag the events in the order in which they occurred.
    12·1 answer
  • Mayan people were known for participating in which of the following activities?
    12·2 answers
  • I'm only a child and I don't have all the solutions, but I want you to realise, neither do you!
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following sets of people were muckrakers at the end of the nineteenth century?
    10·2 answers
  • Zoroastrianism practices the threefold path of _____.
    6·1 answer
  • How and why had blacks, particularly in the south, been subjected to second-class citizenship by 1900? why were jim crow laws pr
    14·2 answers
  • Why did icarus's wings finally fall apart?
    7·2 answers
  • NO VIS AND PLEASE HELP ASAP!
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement is true concerning American political parties?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!