Answer:
Check explanation
Explanation:
1-“Filmer argued for a strong monarchy, whereas Enlightenment philosophers claimed that government was not necessary because natural law would allow society to advance” is true about the relationship between Enlightenment philosophers and the philosophy of Robert Filmer.
2-Differences between Locke's and Rousseau's philosophies include that Rousseau was more extreme in his beliefs on government, believing government to be inherently oppressive and evil, and that Locke viewed civilization as admirable while Rousseau viewed it as a corrupting influence.
3-In political theory, or political philosophy, John Locke refuted the theory of the divine right of kings and argued that all persons are endowed with natural rights to life, liberty, and property and that rulers who fail to protect those rights may be removed by the people, by force if necessary.
4-To prevent men from living in fear of one another, Locke, Rousseau and Montesquieu believed that societies must be based on social contracts, or what Montesquieu called a constitution, which would outline the laws of the land, and set in stone what rights the people and the state had
5-The idea of “the divine right of kings” clashes heavily with the idea of a social contract because the former allows for a person to rule based only on hereditary succession, whereas the latter says that the people are ultimately in charge of how they are ruled.
A fee. It’s price depends on your bank but it is usually around 30$$
Not true Plato did NOT conclude that all states were bad
