First off, you got the first one wrong, it is "Common Sense" that he wrote.
Question 6: Continental congress, Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, rights/freedom/liberty, signed on July 4th (not really, but that was the accepted date)
"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
Answer:
sociological imagination,
Explanation:
With the term "sociological imagination" first written in 1959, Mills refers to the sociological imagination, as the mindset for sociologists and students of sociology, that enables us to connect individual experiences and social events.
It also enables us to differentiate, measure the social forces of a public character, in an individual, group and public spheres.
It is an effort to identify the impact on private life, put it in context or disassociate it.
The sociological imagination lets us understand the historical process that lay before us, and that targe us in terms of our personal experiences.
Based on the circumstances, we identify private issues, as such. The character of interactions with other people. We set public issues into a whole another arena and make relationships within the social structures.
It is a key ability for anyone engaging in research and study of social science. The ability to gain insight and a correct framework and perspective comes from plentiful suggestions that Wight Mills wrote- :)
The correct answer is <span>e. the conflict that arises from occupying social positions that are ranked differently
Status i</span>nconsistency refers to the phenomenon where an individual possesses status qualities that rank as both relatively high as well as relatively low. Some examples of status inconsistency include an intelligent graduate student who has to work as a dish washer to pay for bills, or a wealthy man who is a serving a prison sentence and is adjusting to a sub par lifestyle.