Why is reading comprehension a cornerstone for critical thinking?

2 answers:

7 0

The answer would be C. if one is unable to understand what is written, any conclusions drawn from it are likely to be flawed.

mylen [45]3 years ago

6 0

The right answer is "c.If one is unable to understand what is written, any conclusions drawn from it are likely to be flawed."

Nowadays, people are very immediate and sometimes only read the title or the first line of a journalistic text or post. Without giving importance to the interpretation and understanding of the text. No one has the ability to interpret without reading in full the textual genres

Therefore, reading comprehension should be present 24 hours in our lifetime. Because its importance is in the acquisition of spoken and written vocabulary, argumentative ability, world knowledge and construction of critical thinking. If someone fails in their reading comprehension, their critical thinking will be weak and their conclusions will probably be wrong.

Related searches

What is Contents of the Dead Man's Pocket'' mostly about

Contents of a Dead Man's pocket multiple choice Questions

Contents of a Dead Man's Pocket pdf

How did tom force himself to concentrate

Contents of a Dead Man's Pocket theme

Contents of the dead Man's pocket Quizlet

Contents of a Dead Man's Pocket scavenger hunt for information 1 answers

To Tom, the contents of his pockets represent

More results

Nigeria

Trans Amadi, Port Harcourt - Based on your past activity - Learn more

Terms

5 0

3 years ago

To what does the poet compare the lass? A. nomads B. musicians C. birds D. sailors

Lera25 [3.4K]

C.Birds because It is

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Name one context in which you would use informal (non standard) English?<br>

Nady [450]

Answer:

A context in which I would use informal English to communicate would be with my friends or my family group, that is, in a non-academic environment where the idiomatic expressions used to communicate are those of common speech, with a flat and non-specific language, and lacking of formalities or hierarchical structures within the syntax.

Thus, informal language avoids the use of unusual idioms, given the relative familiarity between the sender and receiver of the message.

5 0

3 years ago

Bridging the gap? Claim of fact, claim of policy, claim of value

Hoochie [10]

Claim of fact

Asserts whether there has been, persists or will be a condition. Based on the truth, or acknowledged as reasonably verifiable by the audience. Factual arguments are non-negotiable.

Claim of Value

There are two general areas where people usually disagree over importance matters.

1. Aesthetics- The study of beauty and the fine arts. The Rogerian approach to dispute resolution can be helpful in addressing conflicts over determining criteria.

2. Morality- Direct decision about rightness or misconduct of behavior or belief. Disagreements are as simple and as profound.

Claim of Policy- Stipulates that particular plans or courses of action should be developed as solutions to problems.

6 0

3 years ago