Answer:
more people were being hired to work on farms
Explanation:
Parliamentary democracy, so answer choice d
They Would Have To Pay Taxs For The War And Families Would Loose People That They Loved During The War.The Prices On Things Would Go Up And It Could Be Possible That There Could Be A Draft If They Loose To Many People.They Would Loose Land From The War And The Diffrent Countries Would Fight Over Land And Try To Conquer Land.
Answer:
The good thing is: The United States felt obligated, through dollar diplomacy, to uphold economic and political stability. Taft's dollar diplomacy not only allowed the United States to gain financially from countries but also restrained other foreign countries from reaping any sort of financial gain
The bad thing is: In spite of successes, “dollar diplomacy” failed to counteract economic instability and the tide of revolution in places like Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, and China.
Explanation:
All of the statements listed here are factors in the decline of Sumer.
They are all somewhat linked to each other, in that due to the failure
of the soil there was less food available to the people of Sumer -
something which had not previously ever been an issue, in fact they were
able to grow more crops than they actually needed. This of course meant
that the invaded cities were already weakened.