Judging by the way the pattern goes,
1+3=4
4+5=9
9+7=16
16+9=25
25+11=36
Then the next 3 numbers would be:
36+13= 49
49+15=64
64+17=81
The next three numbers are 49, 64 and 81
The pattern is adding 2 to each number. So 3 is added to 1 to make 4. The next number added to 4 would be 5, so on so forth.
In the given statement above, in this case, the answer would be TRUE. It is true that the inequality x + 2y ≥ 3 is satisfied by point (1, 1). In order to prove this, we just have to plug in the values. 1 + 2(1) <span> ≥ 3
So the result is 1 + 2 </span> ≥ 3. 3 <span> ≥ 3, which makes it true, because it states that it is "more than or equal to", therefore, our answer is true. Hope this answer helps.</span>
2 = 2????
Thats what Im getting it from.
Since x is 2 then it would still be 2=2 in simple term.
Answer:
Given
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that: △RST ~ △VWX, TU is the altitude of △RST, and XY is the altitude of △VWX.
Comparing △RST and △VWX;
TU ~ XY (given altitudes of the triangles)
<TUS = <XYW (all right angles are congruent)
<UTS ≅ <YXW (angle property of similar triangles)
Thus;
ΔTUS ≅ ΔXYW (congruent property of similar triangles)
<UTS + <TUS + < UST = <YXW + <XTW + <XWY = 
(sum of angles in a triangle)
Therefore by Angle-Angle-Side (AAS), △RST ~ △VWX
So that:
= 
(corresponding side length proportion)
Answer:
d
Step-by-step explanation:
