1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lunna [17]
4 years ago
6

A country with a very low per capita GDP can have a very high growth rate because mathematically, when the________ is________, e

ven a small difference in the________will result in a large growth rate.

Business
2 answers:
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A country with a very low per capita GDP can have a very high growth rate because mathematically, when the <u>DENOMINATOR</u> is <u>VERY LOW</u>, even a small difference in the <u>NUMERATOR</u> will result in a large growth rate.

Explanation:

The reason why poor countries tend to grow at much higher rate than rich countries is fairly simple to explain, a small increase in absolute revenue will result in a large percent increase. On the other hand, rich countries need really large increases in revenue in order to get a small percent increase.

For example, in 2018 the GDP per capita in the US is $62,641, a $1,000 increase would result in only a 1.6% increase.

On the other hand, in 2018 the GDP per capita in China is $10,200, a $1,000 increase would result in a 9.8% increase.

in 2018 the GDP per capita in Africa (the whole continent) is $4,097.85, a $1,000 increase would result in a 24.4% increase.

In order to get a 24.4% increase in the American GDP per capita, an increase of $19,781.37 would be needed. China's economic indicators are showing this, before t grew by more than 10% per year, now it is growing below 7%, and soon it will be growing at around 5%. It is not possible to keep growing at extremely high rates forever.

lana66690 [7]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Denominator

Lower

Numerator

Explanation:

The reason is that the statement is talking about the low per capita GDP which we can see in the picture attached with this answer.

We can see that if the denominator is lower which means that either population decreases or remains constant when the GDP has increased then the the growth in the per capita GDP will be higher because minute increases in the GDP will increase the answer with significant percentages.

You might be interested in
You supply a good at a price of $5. You also earn a profit at this price. This means that your marginal cost could be _____.
Fed [463]
<span>You supply a good at a price of $5. You also earn a profit at this price. This means that your marginal cost could be less than $5.
Hope it helps.
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Columbia Products produced and sold 1,200 units of the company’s only product in March. You have collected the following informa
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

1. $70

2. $106.42

Explanation:

(1) Variable manufacturing cost per unit:

= Direct labor + Direct material + Variable overhead

= $10 + $34 + $26

= $70

(2) Full cost per unit:

= Direct labor + Direct material + Variable overhead + Variable selling cost + (Fixed ÷ 1,200)

= $10 + $34 + $26 + $5 + [(19,500 + 18,200) ÷ 1,200)]

= $75 + $31.42

= $106.42

8 0
4 years ago
Suppose the price of​ regular-octane gasoline were cents per gallon higher in than in . Do you think there would be an opportuni
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

go back and read it again

6 0
3 years ago
If consumption expenditures are $200 billion, total investment is $50 billion, government purchases are $40 billion, exports are
kolezko [41]

Based on the information given the aggregate expenditures must be: $295 billion.

Using this formula

Aggregate expenditure= Consumption expenditures+ Total investment + Exports

Where:

Consumption expenditures=$200 billion

Total investment= $50 billion

Exports=$45 billion

Let plug in the formula

Aggregate expenditure=$200 billion+$50 billion+$45 billion

Aggregate expenditure=$295 billion

Inconclusion the aggregate expenditures must be: $295 billion.

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/14956152

4 0
2 years ago
On July 1, 2019, Ted, age 73 and single, sells his personal residence of the last 30 years for $368,000. Ted’s basis in his resi
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

Realized gain is $297,144

Recognized gain is $47,144

Adjusted basis for new residence is $175,000

Explanation:

•Ted's Realized gain:

Sales price $368,000 - basis $48,776 - expenses $22,080 = $297,144.

• Ted's Recognized gain:

Realized gain $297,144 - exclusion upto $250,000 = $47,144.

• Ted's basis of the new residence is its cost of $175,000.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country is a good example of a high present rate of investment and a low present rate of consumer goods consumption?
    8·1 answer
  • Why is it important to understand the terminology associated with student<br> finances?
    5·1 answer
  • In order for a driver to graduate from a learner’s license to an operator’s license, how many hours of driving need to be docume
    10·1 answer
  • A government collects $70 billion quarterly in tax revenue. Each year it allocates $15 billion to the justice system and $29 bil
    13·2 answers
  • The highest level of LEED certification is _________.
    14·1 answer
  • Serengeti makes lightweight sunglasses with 100 percent UV protection for people who love to hunt, hike, and bike ride. Its plan
    10·1 answer
  • A five-year security was purchased two years ago by an investor who plans to resell it. The security will be sold by the investo
    12·1 answer
  • The management of Milque Corp. is considering the effects of various inventory-costing methods on its financial statements and i
    11·1 answer
  • A company may choose to launch the same advertising campaign globally. This particular campaign may be launched with identical p
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following individuals is using stress management techniques?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!