You've found an Internet article that supports your view of a research subject. The author seems to have excellent credentials,
and the article is very well written. However, the author seems to be using outdated information to support her claims, and you can't find other articles that corroborate her information. Which of the following statements best describes what your course of action should be and why? A. You should use the article as a reference. The author is obviously an expert in her field and the information doesn't need to be "nitpicked."
B. You should not use the article as a reference. Information from the Internet isn't trustworthy.
C. You should use the article as a reference. The important thing is that you've found a source that will bolster your arguement.
D. You should not use the article as a reference. The lack of corroboration and outdated information outweigh the author's credentials.
<span>There are many scientists in history that have made important discoveries. However, through time these discoveries are proven wrong, or built upon.
The article should not be used because it has outdated information. Although the author has worthy credentials, the information is what is important. If the information is wrong, the source should not be used.
The answer is D.</span>
c. He wants his son to study the basics of Judaism before entering “a world fraught with peril.”
Explanation:
Elie is the only boy out of his siblings. Elie wants to study the Kabbalah which is the ancient mystical interpretation of the Bible, but his dad thinks he's too young and doesn't want him to study it because he believes he should study the basics first.
