<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
Answer:
New South
Explanation:
The term "New South" has also been used to refer to political leaders in the American South who embraced progressive ideas on education and economic growth and minimized racist rhetoric, even if not promoting integration
There was a financial profit from slavery in the US.
Governmental Terrorism is the answer!
Answer:
The correct answer is: B. “reconcentrados” for Cuban rebels.
Explanation:
Commander Valeriano Weyler was a Spanish general and governor in the Philippines and Cuba.
He was sent to Cuba in 1896, to replace officer Arsenio Martínez Campos, to try to put an end to the Cuban Rebellion (the war for independence). To win, he figured out that he had to separate the rebels from the civilians, so he relocated over 300.000 people and divided the country into different section, where the civilians were guarded by the Spanish soldiers.
