<span>The First Amendment prohibits government from abridging "the right of the people peaceably to assemble." People are entitled to assemble and to speak and be heard, as long as they remain nonviolent. This basic freedom ensures that the spirit of the First Amendment survives and thrives even when the majority of citizens would rather suppress expression it finds offensive</span>
Answer:
1.Chamber of the House of Representatives
2.President Washington
3.City Budget Office
4.Pierre Charles L'Enfant
5.President John Adams
Explanation:
It would violate the constitution i believe. The President shouldn't have that much power. Our government was designed to have that many branches to make sure things went slow, so we could protest any new rules. If the president managed to fire the Supreme Court, a crucible part of our government would be gone!
These difficulties range from navigating legal complications to understanding complex transportation systems, securing living arrangements and employment, and battling culture shock, psychological distress, depression and despair. While large-scale immigration created many social tensions, it also produced a new vitality in the cities and states in which the immigrants settled. The newcomers helped transform American society and culture, demonstrating that diversity, as well as unity, is a source of national strength. The tensions could decrease some say that if the population of immigrants were smaller that they would have less problems. Most people don't mind at all today. Welcoming refugees is not just a lifesaving humanitarian gesture at a time when more people worldwide are uprooted by war and crisis than ever before. Refugee resettlement also enriches our economy and enhances our national security. The United States has long offered safe haven to people fleeing violence, tyranny and persecution.
But as the administration lowers the number of refugees allowed into the country, American values, tradition and interests are at stake.
