Question

Katherine has to give a presentation on a city law. She decides to write about bicycling. In her city, there is no law that forces someone on a bike to wear a helmet. She thinks that there should be. Which of the following would make a solid thesis for Katherine's essay?
A.
Police officers and regular cyclists have to wear helmets when they ride, just like racing cyclists do.
B.
It is important for bicycle riders to know the rules of the road in order to be safe and cautious cyclists.
C.
Making people wear helmets when they ride a bike is wrong because not everyone can afford a helmet.
D.
Many head injuries are due to bicyclists not wearing helmets, so a law should be made to prevent them.

Answer 1

Answer:

d

Explanation:

a is way to specified

b would make sense but it is about knowing the rules not why there should be rules

c you cant base laws off the local economics

so d makes the most sense to me

hope that helps

Answer 2

Answer:

D

Explanation:

A is comparing an extreme

B steers away from the main point,

C is a counter argument