1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aneli [31]
3 years ago
15

Someone who assassinated the president of his or her own country would be accused of?

History
2 answers:
nalin [4]3 years ago
7 0
The correct answer would be B. Regicide
Mademuasel [1]3 years ago
6 0
Someone who assassinated the president of his or her own country would be accused of regicide
You might be interested in
The Brooklyn Bridge is significant because it was the first suspension bridge built
steposvetlana [31]
In the United States
3 0
3 years ago
How will the indigenous people begin to resist european control in the 19th century?​
Irina18 [472]

Answer:Revolt

Explanation: The people began wars and kicked their colonizers out of their country.

3 0
3 years ago
Year that Lincoln was election president and first time for the Pony Express
quester [9]
The correct answer is 1860

6 0
2 years ago
Pls Pls Pls Pls answer dis ASAP I WLL GIVE YOU 25 POINTS BUT IT HAS TO BE RIGHT
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer: Drafting

The delegates ultimately combined elements of both plans in what became known as the Connecticut Compromise. The legislative branch would be bicameral, consisting of an upper house—the Senate—and a lower house—the House of Representatives. Representation in the House would be based on population, and each state was allotted two seats in the Senate. The office of the president would constitute the executive authority and was to be chosen by the electoral college.

The structure of government would be federalist in nature, consisting of three independent branches: the legislature, Congress; the executive, the president: and the judicial, the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court would adjudicate disputes between states, and Congress was authorized to levy taxes, declare war, raise an army, regulate interstate commerce, and draft laws consistent with the purpose of exercising these powers.

The compromise also addressed another major point of contention between northern and southern states over the issue of slavery. Should enslaved people be counted for the purpose of a state’s representation in Congress? And if so, how? The northern states did not think enslaved people should be counted at all, while the southern slaveholding states thought they should. The Three-Fifths Compromise established that enslaved men and women would be represented in the House at a ratio of 3 to 5 of their actual numbers. Thus, every five individuals would count as three for the purposes of both legislative representation and taxation.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was one of the most notorious provisions of the Constitution. For delegates from the northern states, many of whom were morally opposed to the institution of slavery, the compromise was viewed as a necessary evil in order to secure the ratification of the Constitution since the southern states had threatened to refuse to ratify the document if the interests of southern slaveholders were not protected therein.

- RATIFYING the Constitution

Before the Constitution could take effect, it had to be ratified—formally approved by the assemblies of at least nine of the 12 states that had sent delegates to the convention.Ironically enough, after the acrimonious debates over legislative representation, the small states were the first to ratify the Constitution. The most serious opposition to ratifying the document came from the larger states of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. These states were home to large rural populations that sympathized with the plight of farmers like Daniel Shays, who had spearheaded a rebellion against what he perceived as the unjust economic policies and political corruption of the Massachusetts state legislature.

According to many of the Constitution’s opponents, it would create a large, intrusive, and much too powerful federal government that would inevitably recreate the tyranny that the Patriots had fought against in the American Revolution. In order to combat this opposition and get the Constitution ratified, a series of amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, was appended to the document to ensure that the federal government would respect the natural rights of citizens.

4 0
2 years ago
Do the dead still have knowledge about the living *all opinions and facts accepted there's not a right or wrong answer until pro
dsp73
I think so really don’t know
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main contribution of Susan B. Anthony in the suffrage movement?
    7·1 answer
  • Which factor most strongly encouraged settlement of the West in the late 1800s?
    11·2 answers
  • What is one way globalization affects economies around the world?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT a reason for the United States entry into world war 1?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did native americans support the british rather than the americans?
    13·2 answers
  • Can conflict be a good thing ​
    9·1 answer
  • Âthe oldest known type of ink is india or china ink, made from a solution of __________.
    15·1 answer
  • What does government of the people, by the people, for the people mean?
    5·1 answer
  • What is a result of the federal and state governments having concurrent powers
    6·2 answers
  • What harm has been caused by the "Technology Revolution"?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!