1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anygoal [31]
3 years ago
13

How did the Federalists and the Antifederalists debate the issues regarding the

History
2 answers:
katen-ka-za [31]3 years ago
8 0

Option C, They were done only as public debates

<u>Explanation: </u>

The Grand Debate has two parties: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.  

The federalists intended the Constitution to be ratified, not the anti-federalists. The incorporation of the Charter of Rights was one of the key issues which these two sides addressed.

The Federalists thought this provision was not required, because they claimed that because of the Constitution, the government may not have been limited to the people.

The anti-federalists protested that the Constitution had too much authority for the national government, and the citizens would be in danger of tyranny without even a constitution.

lesantik [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Both resorted to essays and articles, to reach the majority of the citizens, to debate the problems or the merits of the Constitution.

Explanation:

The question of the ratification of the Constitution was a pressing issue following the Revolutionary War. Many people had different ideas when it came to the purpose and composition of the country. While Federalists believed that a stronger federal government would benefit the country, the Anti-federalists believed that this might lead to the loss of the liberty gained during the war. The two factions resorted to essays and articles in order to reach the majority of citizens and convince them of supporting their point of view.

You might be interested in
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
The majority of white southern familes owned large numbers of slaves
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

If this is a true or false question then True

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Economic interest groups spend time and effort to help business interests.
puteri [66]

Answer:

This statement is True.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Please mark me as Brainlinieast.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the SIGNIFICANCE of Shays' Rebellion?
Vladimir79 [104]

Explanation:

Shays's Rebellion exposed the weakness of the government under the Articles of Confederation and led many—including George Washington—to call for strengthening the federal government in order to put down future uprisings.

7 0
3 years ago
Help Please! Which of the following was not an initiative of the Unemployed Citizens League of Washington? A. They advocated for
Alborosie
C is not an initiative of the Unemployed Citizens League of Washington.
hope this helps you
=')
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • AP US History question:
    15·1 answer
  • How did people find their way before the invention of maps
    12·2 answers
  • why do you think the Americans were less interested in vengeance after the great war then the French or British?
    6·1 answer
  • What are two ways the bill of Rights opposed the idea of the divine right of kings
    9·2 answers
  • The French and Indian War was a conflict between what groups of people and countries ?​
    7·1 answer
  • What policies of Pennsylvania reflected Quaker beliefs?
    6·2 answers
  • How did tribal locations within Oklahoma influence their decisions to support the Union or the Confederacy?
    10·1 answer
  • Worlds first empire akkaidian or Babylonian
    13·1 answer
  • Why was general aung san asassinated
    12·2 answers
  • Do you think that Carnegie's ideas about the problem of the rich and the poor in
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!