Answer: One significant distinction among Kush and Egypt is their areas. Kush was a domain toward the south of Egypt and was worked at the base of the mountains. They had a consistent measure of precipitation. This precipitation combined with the spillover from the mountains implied that they quite often had fruitful soil. This was an alternate story for Egypt. Egypt relied upon the yearly flooding of the Nile River so as to have great soil to plant and develop food required for endurance. This flooding was indispensable to their progress. Another contrast among Kush and Egypt is that sovereigns governed Kush, not at all like the male lords and pharaohs that controlled Egypt. They additionally fabricated burial chambers like the Egyptians did however the Kush by and large constructed burial chambers with level rooftops on them. Kush likewise had regular assets, for example, gold, ivory, and iron metal. Preservation is likewise a region where they had a few contrasts. The cycle of embalmment in Egypt was frequently held for those with abundance on the grounds that the cycle was costly and the average citizens couldn't manage the cost of it. Kush aristocrats likewise embalmed their dead however the ordinary citizens preserved their dead also.
Explanation:
How to conduct content analysis
Select the content you will analyze. Based on your research question, choose the texts that you will analyze. ...
Define the units and categories of analysis. ...
Develop a set of rules for coding. ...
Code the text according to the rules. ...
Analyze the results and draw conclusions.
Answer:
core nations exploit peripheral nations
Explanation:
Immanuel Wallerstein is one of the dependency theorists that explains global inequality in the international system, According to his neo marxist theory:
Global stratification occurs as core nations exploit the peripheral nations that basically are producers of raw materials and generate cheap labor force.
The dependency theory suggests that the current capitalist system perpetuates inequalities since it reproduces conditions where global markets are controlled by nations like England or the US that are at the core, while other states are semi peripheral and serve as a bridge.
In other words: Dependency theory states that as long as peripheral nations keep relying on core nations for economic stimulus and access to a larger piece of the global economy, they will never gain the stable and consistent economic growth promised.
