Answer: <u><em>The accounting for customer food checks by the supervisor.
</em></u>
An unfitting classification of responsibilities existed because the supervisor was accountable for accounting for customer food checks and depositing acknowledgment and had the quality to set POS totals .
<u><em>Therefore, the correct option is (a)</em></u>
Following the release of the ice-t body count CD, the Philadelphia Municipal Pension Fund Group sold its Time Warner stock.
General Information About Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System Description
Located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System is a public pension fund. Through the management of 18 distinct plans created from 1915 to the present, it provides benefits to police, fire, and civilian employees of the City of Philadelphia. The Board of Pensions and Retirement is responsible for administering it.
With the help of a cutting-edge and effective retirement system, the City of Philadelphia caters to this requirement of its employees. In addition to the Social Security and retirement systems that cover all officers and employees, this scheme gives you, the professional City employee, a monthly retirement income for life.
to know more about Philadelphia Municipal Pension Fund
brainly.com/question/28013095
#SPJ4
Answer:
D) win, because locke had apparent authority to bind the partnership.
Explanation:
Apparent authority refers to an an agent (in this case Locke) that has the power to act on behalf of a principal (the partnership), even though that power has not been expressly granted. The principal's conduct must imply that it has granted that power to the agent in order for a third party to reasonably believe it.
In this case Locke is a partner, so he is part owner of the partnership, that is why Gage reasonably believed that he had the power to place the order. Usually if the agent (Locke) had apparent authority, the principal (the partnership) will be liable for his actions.
Answer:
a.$0.23 per unit and $48,773
Explanation:
The computation of the variable cost per unit and the total fixed costs variable cost per unit and the total fixed costs using the high-low method is shown below:
Variable cost per unit = (High total cost - low total cost) ÷ (High production units - low production units)
= ($114,300 - $87,100) ÷ (284,900 units - 168,100)
= $27,200 ÷ 116,800 units
= $0.23 per unit
Now the fixed cost equal to
= High total cost - (High production units × Variable cost per unit)
= $114,300 - ( 284,900 units × $0.23)
= $114,300 - $65,527
= $48,773
Answer:
$62,500
Explanation:
Budgeted variable cost /hr = $5
Budgeted fixed cost for maintenance = $30,000
Actual fixed cost = $36,000
Actual variable cost = $100,000
Assembly capacity = 20,000hrs
Actual capacity used = 15,000hrs
Finishing capacity =15,000 hrs
Actual capacity used = 9000 hrs
Assembly plant variable cost allocation = 15/24*100000
=$62,500
