Answer:
Adam Smith would have disagreed with this statement. He believed government should not regulate the economy or control trade.
Answer: The French and Indian War (1754–1763) was a theater of the Seven Years' War, which pitted the North American colonies of the British Empire against those of the French, each side being supported by various Native American tribes. At the start of the war, the French colonies had a population of roughly 60,000 settlers, compared with 2 million in the British colonies.[4] The outnumbered French particularly depended on the natives.[5]
Two years into the French and Indian War, in 1756, Great Britain declared war on France, beginning the worldwide Seven Years' War. Many view the French and Indian War as being merely the American theater of this conflict, however in the United States, the French and Indian War is viewed as a singular conflict which was not associated with any European war.[6] French Canadians call it Guerre de la Conquête ('War of the Conquest').[7][8]
Explanation:
A, gold, they did not know that there was gold and if so, it was not verified
It demonstrates it because they were sentenced to an electric chair even though the evidence and the case was highly controversial. The evidence was inconsistent and it was a murder and a robbery that they committed which under normal circumstances would not have such a severe punishment. However, they were considered to be anarchy radicals and extremists in so the red scare helped the case punish them much more severely.
Answer: Because the 44 that lived were smart and started to swim away
Explanation:
