After a case has been granted certiorari which is when four Justices agree to review a case it is then the justices may decide against further review of the case. They can review a case an decide to dismiss it if Court may feel the case presented during oral arguments did not present the constitutional issues in a clear-cut way. In this event the writ of certiorari is "dismissed as improvidently granted" (DIG)—saying, in effect that the Court should not have accepted the case. Harsh right XD
The Supreme Court accepts 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year. - Us courts website claims this number
<span>
Below are the choices:
</span><span>growing fear
uncontrolled rage
extreme happiness
deep bitterness</span><span>
I believe it would be the first one since there is anger or happiness in the context. I Would have to say fear because they don't understand something, and sometimes that can cause someone to be scared of the outcome. </span>
If you're referring to the Civil War era, in the years leading up to the war, once such compromise could have been that slavery could continue to exist where it was, but not spread to other states.
Answer:
The Jews claim that the land dates back to 3,000 years when Jewish kings ruled the regions from Jerusalem. To Palestinians, the land had belonged to them since most, but not all, Jews were driven out around A.D. 135. Islam spread in the 7th century and quickly became the dominant region.
<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that no, Rome did not achieve a balanced government since only certain people were allowed to vote. </span>
