it was started by the British in the 1880's
Answer:
Gladiatorial contests, like chariot races, were originally held in large open spaces with temporary seating; there is evidence that some munera were held in the Roman Forum, for example. As the games became more frequent and popular, there was need for a larger and more permanent structure. Although the Circus Maximus was often pressed into service because of its huge seating capacity, the Romans eventually designed a building specifically for this type of spectacle (called an amphitheatrum because the seating extended all the way around the oval or elliptical performance area, which was covered with sand, harena). Early amphitheaters, both in Rome and elsewhere, were built of wood, but stone amphitheaters proved to be much more durable; the oldest stone amphitheater, built in Pompeii in the first century CE and seating approximately 20,000, is still well preserved (see also this view through an archway on the upper level, a section of stone seats with staircase, and the exterior walls with stairway). Like Roman theaters, amphitheaters were freestanding; because they did not require natural hills, as Greek theaters did, they could be built anywhere. A remarkable painting from a house in Pompeii depicts the amphitheater. In the tree-shaded area in front, vendors have set up temporary shops to sell food and drinks; the exercise-ground to the right was equipped with a large latrine so spectators could relieve themselves. This fresco depicts a specific event that took place in 59 CE, when a fight erupted between the Pompeians and the neighboring Nucerians (much like modern soccer brawls); in punishment for the riot, Nero imposed a ten-year ban on gladiatorial fights in the amphitheater.
Explanation:
The answer is a) they tightened the grip of the communist party over china
So Capitalism is an economic system where a country's trade, industry, and profits are not controlled by the government.
Each person using their own definition of capitalism make constructive discussion of it impossible. To discuss capitalism honestly, it requires a mutually agreed upon definition, which absent an explicit agreement to the contrary would normally be Webster’s. According to Webster’s, capitalism is “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.”
If your definition is different from the above, as in many of the answers here, then you are talking about something different than capitalism, by it’s normal definition. Very different, in the case of the left wing answers here. Which means you’re just talking past people instead of to them, arguing against something nobody is arguing for. That’s called a “strawman argument” and would never be considered a compelling argument to anyone with a functioning brain.
I got this statement from quora written by Al jones
:)
