Answer:
The President can veto a bill indirectly by withholding approval of the bill until Congress has adjourned sine die. This informal way of preventing a bill from becoming a law is called a pocket veto. When the President issues a veto, the bill returns to its House of origin.
Explanation:
Because, at that time, the unwritten rule of the politics regarding this kind of situation was the rule of laissez-faire, meaning that the economy should be left do deal with it`s problems without the intervention of the government.
Answer:
In the late 18th century France was in upheaval. Having just overthrown its centuries old monarchy, the Revolutionaries were attempting to stabilize the country and create a new government that would benefit everyone. Theories abounded, debate was intense, and any opposition to the ideas put forth by the revolution’s leaders was brutally punished, usually at the guillotine. In 1789 the Marquis de Lafayette published the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. Based strongly on the American Declaration of Independence the document was meant to lay the groundwork for the new government. However, there were some who thought it incomplete. The most notable was Madame Olympe de Gouges. In 1791 de Gouges published the Declaration of the Rights of Woman. Clearly directed and modeled after the Rights of Man, the Rights of Woman pushed for women’s suffrage and other equal rights. Though surprisingly similar, the two documents have some key differences in their wording, mostly relating to what defines a citizen. The goals were the same: improve life for the French people, though de Gouges of course had a broader viewpoint of how that should be achieved. Neither document would ultimately prove effective in their time, but both laid the groundwork for the ideals of future generations.
Both the declaration of de Lafayette and that of de Gouges seem to agree on what the rights of the citizen are. Madame de Gouges followed the same format with her articles and spelled out the same rights almost word for word. These include the right to freedom without social distinction, freedom from oppression, free speech, and the right to own property. They also both speak of the right to participate in government personally or through a representative. Both agree that there has been public disruption and government corruption. Both believe in fair trial, reasonable punishment, and the right to equal distribution of government benefits based on equal contribution to said government. Both documents also had the same ultimate goal. They wanted to extend equal rights and make the life of French citizens better under the new government.
Explanation:
