In what ways were the rivers that fed the civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt different?

1 answer:

4 0

Egypt and Mesopotamia were two of the world's earliest city-based civilizations, forming the foundation for Middle Eastern and Western history. Though they shared many broad similarities, such as agricultural society, polytheistic religions and written traditions, they also had many differences. These contrasts included geographic orientation, cultural emphases, political organization and other aspects.

You might be interested in

Monarchs tried to improve what by increasing thier power

Verizon [17]

Well a few reasons.
- Creating a justice system that included lords and vassals
- Having a standing army (permanent, organized army)
- Creating a government bureaucracy (Government staffed by non-elected officials)

5 0

3 years ago

What term means a strong feeling of devotion to one's country? a)Democratism b)Nationalism c)Militarism d)Republicanism

Verizon [17]

answer is (a)

hope this will help you.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following was one of the outcomes at Potsdam? Reparations were to be paid to the Axis countries. The division of Ge

bagirrra123 [75]

The division of Germany and Berlin into occupational zones was confirmed.

It is not:

Reparations were to be paid to the Axis Countries, because they lost the war, and the Axis had to pay reparation to the allies.
The division of France into occupational zones was confirmed, because France was on the allied side, and they won the war.

so you answer is "The division of Germany and Berlin into occupation zones was confirmed."

hope this helps

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The U.S can punish a state which denies the right of citizens to vote by:

Feliz [49]

Well the government would not want to take a state out of the union. so i would say it is C.reducing the number of its represenatives

6 0

4 years ago

Burke insists that the historical foundations of france were fundamentally sound, and thus the revolution of 1789 was unnecessar

Aliun [14]

If your options are: a) The competing interests of the people were institutionalized in the Estates General, generating a "reciprocal struggle" that would reconcile discordant powers, b) The monarchy, though occasionally unjust, provided stability and security, c) The "discordant interests" of the various corporate bodies of France— the guilds, municipalities, nobility, and 
clergy— were mediated by the monarch and his officials, and d) All of the above, the correct answer in my opinion is d) All of the above. Burke provides a comprehensive critique of the French revolution in all of its aspects. Even though he admits it was a remarkable event, he disagrees that it would bring about a new, more just and sound political system. Of course, the old monarchy was bad in many respects, but it didn't have to be abolished altogether. It could be fixed. Instead, monarchy was replaced by anarchy and traditions were violently dismantled.

8 0

3 years ago