This argument illustrates the slippery slope fallacy as Leo Panchello was used to create a happy picture of how much hard work local business owners put in and then goes on to tell how the light rail would destroy the local business and ruin all of their hard work which brings a sad ending.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
This is known as a mistaken belief, a faulty or failed reasoning especially one based on unsound argument.
Hence, the fallacy makes the argument weak because there's no indication that a light rail would destroy a main local business in the town as when constructing a light rail, they do not tear up the street, instead, they make the light rail a part of the street
A slippery slope fallacy is a course of action that is rejected because there is little or no evidence that one insists to lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end.
Read more about<em> fallacy </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1971023
#SPJ1
The answer is C - Similarities and differences
Answer:
Okay i think the first one is both
Explanation:
Answer:
people of similar age, who share similar interests
Rainsford's actions are justified because he will never truly be free until Zaroff is dead. A "beast at bay" refers to someone who is still being hunted. Rainsford will always feel hunted as long as Zaroff is alive, because he knows the 'hunt' will always go on in Zaroff's mind. He has to kill Zaroff so he doesn't have to live in fear.
