The argument is <em>that children go to school to learn not to teach their elders ,</em> where teachers can be included. Public schools are subsidised with taxes. Bearing this in mind, we may say that taxpayers send their children to school for them to learn not to teach. This was what the taxpayers did when <em>they themselves </em>were students . Therefore, t<em>axpayers send their children to school on the premise that, at their age, they needed to learn, not teach </em>is the reasoning of the argument.
Gregor's character represents an ordinary person in the early 1900s. Thus, Option A is the correct statement.
<h3>How does Gregor's family alternate in the metamorphosis?</h3>
Gregor has been the primary breadwinner withinside his own circle of relatives earlier than turning into an insect.
His transformation makes it impossible for him to maintain working, so the 3 individuals in his own circle of relatives all ought to discover jobs, and the own circle of relatives takes in boarders for extra income.
Thus, Gregor's character represents an ordinary person in the early 1900s. Option A is the correct statement.
learn more about metamorphosis:
brainly.com/question/4468709
#SPJ1
Answer: The subject and verb do not agree.
The subject and verb in a sentence must agree with one another in number i.e. singular or plural. It means that if the subject is singular then the verb must also be singular. If the subject is plural then the verb must also be plural.
The given sentence is in the present tense so the noun and verb must form singular/plural in opposite ways: by adding 's' to the nouns and removing 's' from the verb to form singular.
The correct sentence would be: Brad and Alicia say they are available to babysit on Friday night.
Answer:
yesssssssss it's is like now since school is no longer in
I really don’t know I’m so sorry I’ll try and answer it
