Answer:
D. to me the atom bomb seem not so bad.
Explanation:
if I am correct the video is "Duck and Cover"? I remember learning about this last year. The atom bomb was capable of extreme amounts of damage, so downplaying it for the kids and teaching them to 'duck and cover' in the form of a cartoon was the easiest way to help them learn safety procedures in case of an attack.
Answer:
The answer is C
The city's housing could not keep up with the population surge.
Explanation:
In the 16th century, vernice was already a center of attraction. Vernice,a city in northeastern Italy and the capital of the Veneto region. It is situated on a group of 118 small islands that are separated by canals and linked by over 400 bridges.
The name "VERNICE" is derived from the ancient Veneti people who inhabited the region by the 10th century BC. The city was historically the capital of the Defunct Republic of Venice which was a great nation that existed long time ago, By the 16th century, Venice was the capital of its own huge empire and a major crossroads of trade and travel between Europe and the Mediterranean. At the same time, painters including Titian and Giorgione were making the city a centre of Renaissance culture, the population surged from around 100,000 to nearly 170,000. The city housing could not keep up with The population and so many
Venetians began opening up their homes for rent.
The arrest of a criminal suspect.
If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney ...." There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.
Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966. Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman. He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights. After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.
