Answer:
The correct answer is D) The operation of internal service funds has no impact on other funds because it is run as a business and provides services that would have been purchased elsewhere by the other funds.
Explanation:
This is false because the operation of these funds represent a direct impact on other funds in the portfolio because they are related within the same business scheme and therefore transfer transactions (purchase and sale) of services corresponding to other portfolios or funds with guarantees and expectations of growth in the short term.
Answer:
Ownership utility
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Spalkyn most likely provides Ownership utility. This term refers to when a company allows for the orderly transfer of their goods or services to the buyer. Which is what Spalkyn does by giving their customers various different options when purchasing their goods, so that they can choose whichever option is easiest for them.
answer
<em>c </em><em> </em><em>i </em><em>don't </em><em>need </em><em>to </em><em>explain </em><em>I'd </em><em>take </em><em>c</em>
Answer:
The use of the bank's funds for this fundraiser would be justified when the bank's goal is to maximize profit by:
giving the bank public relations boost, thereby improving its public image.
Explanation:
The creation of publicity opportunities through this fundraiser enhances the bank's activities. Awareness of its services is created through the sponsorship. People perceive the bank as a charity-supporting organization, which cares for the welfare of the less-privileged. The fundraiser creates huge goodwill. Public relation is, therefore, critical in helping the bank to engage its diverse publics across various platforms, including the accruing intangible benefits that derivable from the seemingly unprofitable effort.
Answer:
A. 300
Explanation:
The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 
where,
Annual demand = 600 bottles × 50 weeks = 30,000 bottles
Carrying cost per bottle = $50 × 40% = $20
And, the ordering cost per order is $30
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= 
= 300 bottles
Hence, option A is correct
