1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mash [69]
3 years ago
11

Why did constitutional monarchy develop in England while absolute monarchy continued in Russia?

History
1 answer:
Brut [27]3 years ago
4 0
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice "<span>Russia was less economically developed than England and relied on a strong monarch to address the nation’s issues."


</span>In Britain, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to a constitutional monarchy restricted by laws such as the Bill <span>of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701, although limits on the power of the monarch ('A Limited Monarchy') are much older than that, as seen in our Magna Carta.</span>

I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
You might be interested in
What effect did the revolutions in Central and South America have on the social structure of
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

Buildings got damged and familys broke out

Explanation:

was really crazy

7 0
3 years ago
Is it possible for a society to achieve equality without liberty? Explain.
vampirchik [111]

No. They are tied together. If someone is considered less than equal to another person under the law, then that person will always be the so-called protected or higher person's slave. Human will to power is this way. Freedom (liberty) is ONLY possible when all people are considered equal to each other

7 0
4 years ago
How did the political structure in classical India differ from the political structure in classical China?
tatuchka [14]
C might be the answer but I'm not sure

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Afrter analyzing the illustration by paul rever of the boston massacre, what was his intent?<br>​
Sidana [21]

Answer:

In the images of the troops and colonists, it appears that the British are

unmercifully murdering the colonists. The colonists look innocent and

helpless, while the British look like cold blooded killers. I would assume that

these images were a colonists point of view of how things happened. The

document made the colonists seem like extremely aggressive protesters that

wanted nothing more, but to hurt the colonists. It also makes it seem like the

British did it accidentally. I would expect this to be the British point of view.

Please mark as brainliest

4 0
3 years ago
Most European countries relied on what type of rule? ASAP PLZZ
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

the one to control the people

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!! FIRST PERSON WITH RIGHT ANSWER GET BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • In 1936 a rebellion erupted in Spain after a coalition of Republicans, Socialists, and Communists was elected. General Francisco
    15·1 answer
  • What are ten battles/events that helped the allies win WW1 and where did they take place?
    6·1 answer
  • A pocket veto occurs when _____.
    14·2 answers
  • In the years leading to World War I, the spirit of nationalism increased competition among nations to do which of the following?
    13·2 answers
  • 90 POINTS PLEASE HELP! Give three examples of how the Civil War and United States industry impacted each other. In other words,
    14·2 answers
  • What does it mean when a question asks you, "develop the character Alice"??
    15·1 answer
  • Why is it useful for historians to craft historical narrative
    6·2 answers
  • Please help me! Thank you! Why did the Filipinos wage war against the Americans?
    14·1 answer
  • "On Wednesday we entered the great city of Tabriz in Persia. Commerce flourishes here. Today, there must be at least 200,000 hou
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!