People can endure a lot. Enduring characteristics within a person in that person's relationships with others are called key traits in personalities
<h3>What are the key traits in personalities? </h3>
These are known to be enduring characteristics found within a person or in his or her relationships with people.
Such traits are said to be assertiveness, extroversion, compliance, dominance, and others. Humans are known to have some measures of these traits.
Learn more about Enduring characteristics from
brainly.com/question/6966392
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
The four major players are: Hamilton, Burr, Nathaniel Pendleton, William Van Ness.
Hamilton was the first secretary of treasure and he was against Burr during the duel. Burr was the Vice President to Jefferson and he was against Hamilton. Nathaniel Pendleton was a lawyer and Hamilton's second. William Van Ness was a lawyer and Burr's second.
Burr arrived first on the ground as had been previously agreed. When Genl Hamilton arrived the parties exchanged salutations and the Seconds proceeded to make their arrangments. There’s this musical that’s been getting some attention lately, Hamilton. Maybe you’ve heard of it. In the musical, Burr announces that there are 10 things you need to know about the duel, though actually he cites plenty more.
To learn more about Hamilton here
brainly.com/question/1523962
#SPJ4
Answer: the answer is below
Explanation: the ideational theory of is like what does the person mean or what he or she has done for something or someone
