Answer:
This contention relates to the deontological moral point of view. This is on the grounds that it advocates for the reception of widespread laws that serve humanity.
This contention relates to the uprightness morals viewpoint. This is on the grounds that it supports creating temperances, for example, uprightness as a key component of moral reasoning.
This contention compares to the ethical relativism moral viewpoint. This is on the grounds that it acknowledges the view that profound quality isn't fixed and general and actually, differs from culture to culture.
Moral is a lot of standards or the privilege or wrongs which must be trailed by a person in their own and expert life.
For this situation, consequentialism alludes to responsibility implies assuming liability or responsibility for the activities taken by you.
Obligation morals or deontology implies the ethical quality of an activity depends on the set in stone under a progression of rules.
Excellence morals are regularizing morals that underline more on character and brain.
Moral Relativism accentuation more on the distinctions in moral judgment across various individuals and culture.
The contention identified with same-sex marriage depends on moral relativism as everybody's judgment is unique and not the equivalent. Everybody's point of view is unique and they judge distinctively as per their viewpoint. It's not about reproduction, it's tied in with carrying on with our existence with an individual whom we feel progressively great and has the conviction that both can lead a coexistence.
Dropping the nuclear bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki depends on Duty morals implies doing right or wrong dependent on a progression of rules. Here the activity isn't right as it has lead to the loss of numerous guiltless lives.
Dropping the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the need of the time as it was consequentialism. This was the demonstration of results.
The choice of Mr. Jones depends on the record verification and character references as it is obligation morals. An individual having a terrible foundation and poor character can't be a state senator.
Servitude isn't right in our general public, as it is an ethical relativism.
