Answer: Trade between the two countries is beneficial when United States trade food to Canada and Canada would trade televisions to the United States.
Explanation: In international trade, each country will produce a good in which it has a comparative advantage (lower opportunity cost).
Opportunity cost of food is,
Unites states = 
Canada =
Opportunity cost of television is,
Unites states = 
Canada =
Since, opportunity cost of food is lower in the United states, United states will export food.
Opportunity cost of television is lower in Canada, Canada will export television to the United States.
Answer:
e. there is downward pressure on the price level, and the government may want to conduct expansionary fiscal policy.
Explanation:
At the time of boom in the economy, the unemployment rate is beneath than the rate i.e. natural also it gives rise to the growth of the economy, along with it the expenditures, consumer spending also increased that ultimately increased the disposable income.
This results in the upward movement in terms of pressure on the aggregate demand that leads to a rise in the level of price and the real GDP also rises which reduced the unemployment
But when the aggregate demand is less so there is a downward pressure on the price as the level of price declines so that the aggregate demand increased and it is requirement made by the government for an expansionary fiscal policy that give increased in government spending or taxes decreased in order to raise the aggregate demand
Answer:
The correct answer is: Build-up approach
.
Explanation:
The Build-up approach estimates the sales potential of the company by calculating how much of a product could be purchased in a given period by a potential buyer in a specific geographic region. The calculation is then multiplied by the number of potential customers, adding the sum of all the considered geographic areas.
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.