Answer:
Letter A is correct.<u> </u><em><u>Unsystematic</u></em><em> </em>risk.
Explanation:
Unlike systematic risk, which is an inherent market risk, unsystematic risk is inherent in a specific sector or company.
The case in point concerns the investment of former AlphaEnergy employees, which is a unsystematic risk, as the investment risk in single-company shares includes regulatory changes, management changes, loss of market due to competition and withdrawal of the product from the market.
To reduce this type of risk, investors should seek diversification in their stock portfolio.
Answer:
$290,000
Explanation:
We start with the cost of building a replica of the house:
building a new house: $350,000
plus highest and best use $25,000
minus perceived value loss ($20,000)
minus physical deterioration ($50,000)
<u>minus building obsolescence ($15,000) </u>
appraised value $290,000
<u>Answer:</u>
<u><em>Laws passed by the federal government often provide benefits for a small number of individuals. These individuals, in turn, have an incentive to contribute to the campaigns of politicians who pass these laws</em></u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
When individuals or firms cunningly try to get benefits from government at the detriment of others it term rent seeking.
Implying they seek shelter under this laws that benefit them the most.
For example, certain tax laws may favor the weather citizens of a country and they (the wealthier citizens) may take advantage of that.
Answer: pegged exchange rate
Explanation:
A pegged exchange rate also referred to as the fixed exchange rate, sometimes is an exchange rate regime type whereby the value of a currency is fixed by the monetary authority of a particular country against the value of the currency of another country.
This is the type of exchange rate used by the Chinese government in the question above.
Answer: The answers are provided below
Explanation:
There are several similarities between the project management processes which surround scrum to the traditional project management processes which surrounds a project life cycle such as Waterfall. When one looks at each iteration as a project, one will see that Scrum planning meeting will be identical to planning meeting of the traditional project.
The daily standups in scrum will resemble the monitoring and the controlling of traditional waterfall with the exception that in scrum, its team monitors itself. A sprint would be the execution stage while the sprint review will be like project closure lessons that are learned. Sprint can be seen as small waterfall model project.
However, the main difference is in the scrum's team mindset versus the team of the traditional project management. Also, the process of work defining as being completed is different for the teams. Lastly, the method used by the scrum team in its approaches to work, team collaboration, responsibility acceptance, tasks definition and accountability are different from the traditional project management team.
A hybrid approach will be sensible in a large organization which has pockets of power. This is true for large retails that have old legacy systems in which frequent deployments aren't possible.
This is true for systems in which, testing can't be automated due to the fact that automated testing is a vital part for success for large scrum projects. In such organizations, it is sensible to use scrum for the teams which are able to move to scrum and waterfall can be used for other parts of the organization.
