1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antiseptic1488 [7]
3 years ago
13

Who fought in the French and Indian War?

History
1 answer:
Bezzdna [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The war was fought primarily between the colonies of Great Britain and New France, with both sides supported by forces from Europe as well as American Indian allies.

You might be interested in
The culture of Libya and the Maghreb is a blend of _____, European, and Asian influences.
lesantik [10]

Answer:

The culture of Libya and the Maghreb is a blend of African, European, and Asian influences

Explanation:

Hope This helps

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the neutrality act from 1935 break down
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

This Act lifted the arms embargo and put all trade with belligerent nations under the terms of “cash-and-carry.” The ban on loans remained in effect, and American ships were barred from transporting goods to belligerent ports.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why did so many African countries face difficult challenges after winning their independence?
-BARSIC- [3]
<h3>One of the most pressing challenges African states faced at Independence was their lack of infrastructure. European imperialists prided themselves on bringing civilization and developing Africa, but they left their former colonies with little in the way of infrastructure. The empires had built roads and railroads - or rather, they had forced their colonial subjects to build them - but these were not intended to build national infrastructures. Imperial roads and railways were almost always intended to facilitate the export of raw materials. Many, like the Ugandan Railroad, ran straight to the coastline. </h3><h3> </h3><h3> </h3><h3>These new countries also lacked the manufacturing infrastructure to add value to their raw materials. Rich as many African countries were in cash crops and minerals, they could not process these goods themselves. Their economies were dependent on trade, and this made them vulnerable. They were also locked into cycles of dependencies on their former European masters. They had gained political, not economic dependencies, and as Kwame Nkrumah - the first prime minister and president of Ghana - knew, political independence without economic independence was meaningless.  </h3><h3> </h3><h3> </h3><h2>Energy Dependence</h2><h3>The lack of infrastructure also meant that African countries were dependent on Western economies for much of their energy. Even oil-rich countries did not have the refineries needed to turn their crude oil into gasoline or heating oil. Some leaders, like Kwame Nkrumah, tried to rectify this by taking on massive building projects, like the Volta River hydroelectric dam project. The dam did provide much-needed electricity, but its construction put Ghana heavily into debt. The construction also required the relocation of tens of thousands of Ghanaians and contributed to Nkrumah's plummeting support in Ghana. In 1966, Nkrumah was overthrown.  </h3><h3> </h3><h2>Inexperienced Leadership</h2><h3>At Independence, there were several presidents, like Jomo Kenyatta, had several decades of political experience, but others, like Tanzania's Julius Nyerere, had entered the political fray just years before independence. There was also a distinct lack of trained and experienced civil leadership. The lower echelons of the colonial government had long been staffed by African subjects, but the higher ranks had been reserved for white officials. The transition to national officers at independence meant there were individuals at all levels of the bureaucracy with little prior training. In some cases, this led to innovation, but the many challenges that African states faced at independence were often compounded by the lack of experienced leadership. </h3><h3> </h3><h3> </h3><h2>Lack of National Identity</h2><h3>The borders Africa's new countries were left with were the ones drawn in Europe during the Scramble for Africa with no regard to the ethnic or social landscape on the ground. The subjects of these colonies often had many identities that trumped their sense of being, for instance, Ghanaian or Congolese. Colonial policies that privileged one group over another or allocated land and political rights by "tribe" exacerbated these divisions. The most famous case of this was the Belgian policies that crystallized the divisions between Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda that led to the tragic genocide in 1994. </h3><h3> </h3><h3>Immediately after decolonization, the new African states agreed to a policy of inviolable borders, meaning they would not try to redraw Africa's political map as that would lead to chaos. The leaders of these countries were, thus, left with the challenge of trying to forge a sense of national identity at a time when those seeking a stake in the new country were often playing to individuals' regional or ethnic loyalties.  </h3><h3> </h3><h2>Cold War</h2><h3>Finally, decolonization coincided with the Cold War, which presented another challenge for African states. The push and pull between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) made non-alignment a difficult, if not impossible, option, and those leaders who tried to carve third way generally found they had to take sides.  </h3><h3> </h3><h3>Cold War politics also presented an opportunity for factions that sought to challenge the new governments. In Angola, the international support that the government and rebel factions received in the Cold War led to a civil war that lasted nearly thirty years. </h3><h3> </h3><h3>These combined challenges made it difficult to establish strong economies or political stability in Africa and contributed to the upheaval that many (but not all!) states faced between the late '60s and late '90s. </h3>
7 0
3 years ago
Which best describes the first two yeara of the americans revolution
cupoosta [38]

Answer: Kuarten-

Explanation: The Continental army faced defeat nearly every time they fought the British. -best describes the first two years of the American Revolution

5 0
1 year ago
I invented the electrical generator in England around 1831. Who am I?
NikAS [45]
The correct answer is Michael Faraday. Specifically, he invented the electric dynamo, which was later developed further into the power generators we know today.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is referred to as "reverse discrimination" is __________. discrimination that blacks extend toward whites giving minorities
    7·1 answer
  • world war 1 left Germany feeling? a.unfairly punished, b.eager to make friends, c.content with the peace treaties, d.good in the
    5·1 answer
  • Women emerged from the american revolution with the prescribed new responsibility of?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these BEST describes the period in Europe 900s-1200s? A) Individual rulers gained more power. B) The Crusades succeeded
    8·1 answer
  • __________ is an example of a nation that uses a democratic republic type of government.
    15·2 answers
  • Identify the winning side of each battle. first Battle of El AlameinOperation TorchBattle of TobrukBattle of Tunisia
    6·1 answer
  • I know this isn't school related but does anyone go to queen ceek high in AZ?
    10·1 answer
  • What do Aztec and Mayan do you religious have in common? A: monotheism B: polytheism C: atheism D: humanism
    8·2 answers
  • Which describes how the U.S. government changed from the Articles of Confederation to the U.S. Constitution?
    9·1 answer
  • History
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!