1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
2 years ago
10

"In the late 1800s and early 1900s the federal government supported the efforts of the labor movement."

History
1 answer:
Katena32 [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Pullman Strike and Loewe Vs Lawlor

Explanation:

The Pullman Strike was an organised strike by the American Railway Union against the Pullman Company. The strike closed off many of the nations railroad traffic. Workers of the Pullman company had gone on strike in response to a reduction in wages and when this was unsuccessful, they increased their efforts and with the help of the AFU took it nationwide. They refused to couple or move any train that carried a Pullman car. At its peak the strike included  250,000 workers in 27 states.The federal government's response was to obtain an injunction against the union and to order them to stop interfering with trains. When they refused, President Cleveland sent in the army to stop strikers from interfering with the trains. Violence broke out and the strike collapsed. The leaders were sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.

Loewe V Lawlor was a Supreme Court decision that went against the rights of the labour movement. D. E. Loewe & Company had been subjected to a strike and a boycott as a result of it becoming an 'open shop'. The nationwide boycott was supported by the American Federation of Labor and persuaded retailers, wholesalers and customers not to buy from Loewe. This boycott cost him a large amount of money and he sued the union for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (Another piece of legislation subsequently used to attack unions).

The case was sent to the US Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, which found that the lawsuit was out of the scope of the Sherman Act. However, upon appeal it then went to the Supreme Court, who ruled in favour of Loewe. The courts decision was important for two reasons. Firstly it allowed individual unionists to be held personally responsible for damages arising from the activities of their unions. Secondly, it effectively outlawed secondary boycott (Where members of different companies boycott in solidarity with the affected workers) as a violation of the Sherman Act. Both of these limited the ability of the unions to bring about change through striking and boycott.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13463190#readmore

You might be interested in
Which of the following did the Enlightenment promote?*
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

The Enlightenment, a philosophical movement that dominated in Europe during the 18th century, was centered around the idea that reason is the primary source of authority and legitimacy, and advocated such ideals as liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government, and separation of church and state.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Two ways that the work of presidents cabinet affects how a government runs
ivann1987 [24]

The two ways that the work of the president’s cabinet affects how the government runs is by advising and decision making. It is because they are responsible for affecting the president’s decision as they are likely to give advice to the president in certain situations in which will affect the government as the president may follow or associate his decisions with their advice.

3 0
3 years ago
How did Great Britain attempt to sway the United States to support the Allies during World War 1? A) by highlighting German atro
jonny [76]

Your answer would be A) by highlighting German atrocities inflicted on the Allies. Hope this helps!!!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What Roman laws are still used today?
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

Many aspects of Roman Law and the Roman Constitution are still used today. These include concepts like checks and balances, vetoes, separation of powers, term limits, and regular elections. Many of these concepts serve as the foundations of today's modern democratic governments.

Hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
In what two ways were Indians grouped into castes
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

There are two bases of the Indian social division into castes. The castes system has been consolidated and fed by religious practices. Ancient Hindu texts speak about four castes  or profession: brahmins (priests), warriors, merchants and workers. Brahmins were at the top of society, the elite. The other source is simply social practice. There are still several groups that are seen as inferior , the "untouchables" just like the dalits; they perform the lowest and dirtiest jobs.    Though castes don´t exist formally in Indian law, they exist in reality and social and racial divisions run still deep in India.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select all the correct answers.
    6·2 answers
  • Why do you think the U.S government wanted to remove Soviet missiles form Cuba?
    5·2 answers
  • Napoleon bonaparte ordered the establishment of _________ in every major town to train government officials.
    11·1 answer
  • Name the five Native American tribes that were relocated west of the Mississippi<br> River
    5·2 answers
  • Briefly describe the case of cooper v. harris​
    11·1 answer
  • In what ways are cellulose and starch similar to each other and in what ways are they different?
    10·2 answers
  • Which answer best explains how Florida became a US territory?
    5·2 answers
  • How did mayan kings increase their power?
    10·1 answer
  • 1.Read each question and choose the best answer.
    12·1 answer
  • write one similarity and different between the goals of the abolitionist movement and the goals of the womens rights movement?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!