1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
3 years ago
10

"In the late 1800s and early 1900s the federal government supported the efforts of the labor movement."

History
1 answer:
Katena32 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Pullman Strike and Loewe Vs Lawlor

Explanation:

The Pullman Strike was an organised strike by the American Railway Union against the Pullman Company. The strike closed off many of the nations railroad traffic. Workers of the Pullman company had gone on strike in response to a reduction in wages and when this was unsuccessful, they increased their efforts and with the help of the AFU took it nationwide. They refused to couple or move any train that carried a Pullman car. At its peak the strike included  250,000 workers in 27 states.The federal government's response was to obtain an injunction against the union and to order them to stop interfering with trains. When they refused, President Cleveland sent in the army to stop strikers from interfering with the trains. Violence broke out and the strike collapsed. The leaders were sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.

Loewe V Lawlor was a Supreme Court decision that went against the rights of the labour movement. D. E. Loewe & Company had been subjected to a strike and a boycott as a result of it becoming an 'open shop'. The nationwide boycott was supported by the American Federation of Labor and persuaded retailers, wholesalers and customers not to buy from Loewe. This boycott cost him a large amount of money and he sued the union for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (Another piece of legislation subsequently used to attack unions).

The case was sent to the US Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, which found that the lawsuit was out of the scope of the Sherman Act. However, upon appeal it then went to the Supreme Court, who ruled in favour of Loewe. The courts decision was important for two reasons. Firstly it allowed individual unionists to be held personally responsible for damages arising from the activities of their unions. Secondly, it effectively outlawed secondary boycott (Where members of different companies boycott in solidarity with the affected workers) as a violation of the Sherman Act. Both of these limited the ability of the unions to bring about change through striking and boycott.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13463190#readmore

You might be interested in
Help pls <br> PLS pls pls pls pls pls
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

hope it helps

5 0
2 years ago
Which king is accurately described by these statements?
White raven [17]

Louis XIV ,,,,,.........................

4 0
3 years ago
Question 3 of 10
Goshia [24]

Your answer is A. Legacy

8 0
3 years ago
Help mark brainliest
Sidana [21]

Answer:

It means like how are social changes crated. This means like changes in how we create relationships and continue them. We dont realize, but we are changing everyday. So in this question its asking how are those changes created and how to they last?

3 0
2 years ago
What was the 5 main reasons loyalists wanted to remain loyal to the crown of Britain.
stepan [7]

Answer:

People were dying times were hard. One reason was because some people wanted peace, they didnt want violence. They protested and the were purist.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please no nasty answer buddy
    12·1 answer
  • Select the country that allowed for peaceful independence of their African colonies after ww2.
    11·2 answers
  • Can anyone explain the history of the JROTC program?
    8·1 answer
  • Why is October 29th, 1929 called Black Tuesday?
    11·1 answer
  • In what way did imperialism hurt rather than help European nations?
    13·1 answer
  • Why are private companies unlikely to provide public goods?
    5·1 answer
  • Who did Germany owe reparations to?
    14·1 answer
  • Indira Gandhi gained popularity after her response to the:
    14·1 answer
  • How do special-interest groups influence public policy?
    12·1 answer
  • Which argument did anti-abolitionists use?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!