1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
3 years ago
10

"In the late 1800s and early 1900s the federal government supported the efforts of the labor movement."

History
1 answer:
Katena32 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Pullman Strike and Loewe Vs Lawlor

Explanation:

The Pullman Strike was an organised strike by the American Railway Union against the Pullman Company. The strike closed off many of the nations railroad traffic. Workers of the Pullman company had gone on strike in response to a reduction in wages and when this was unsuccessful, they increased their efforts and with the help of the AFU took it nationwide. They refused to couple or move any train that carried a Pullman car. At its peak the strike included  250,000 workers in 27 states.The federal government's response was to obtain an injunction against the union and to order them to stop interfering with trains. When they refused, President Cleveland sent in the army to stop strikers from interfering with the trains. Violence broke out and the strike collapsed. The leaders were sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.

Loewe V Lawlor was a Supreme Court decision that went against the rights of the labour movement. D. E. Loewe & Company had been subjected to a strike and a boycott as a result of it becoming an 'open shop'. The nationwide boycott was supported by the American Federation of Labor and persuaded retailers, wholesalers and customers not to buy from Loewe. This boycott cost him a large amount of money and he sued the union for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (Another piece of legislation subsequently used to attack unions).

The case was sent to the US Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, which found that the lawsuit was out of the scope of the Sherman Act. However, upon appeal it then went to the Supreme Court, who ruled in favour of Loewe. The courts decision was important for two reasons. Firstly it allowed individual unionists to be held personally responsible for damages arising from the activities of their unions. Secondly, it effectively outlawed secondary boycott (Where members of different companies boycott in solidarity with the affected workers) as a violation of the Sherman Act. Both of these limited the ability of the unions to bring about change through striking and boycott.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13463190#readmore

You might be interested in
HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLYIST<br> Part A<br> What is Columbus describing in this passage?
velikii [3]
This passage is explaining that the indigenous people where friendly and where not a threat.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The court case ________ prohibits discrimination based on race by upholding the 1866 civil rights act and the 13th amendment to
Pavlova-9 [17]

The case of Jones v. Mayer upheld the 1866 civil rights act and the 13th Amendment :)

Brainliest answer please?

6 0
3 years ago
Which is true of the 1912 presidential election?
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What historical circumstances led to the building of the Great Wall of China?
Otrada [13]

Answer:Around 220 B.C., Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of a unified China under the Qin Dynasty, ordered that earlier fortifications between states be removed and a number of existing walls along the northern border be joined into a single system that would extend for more than 10,000 li (a li is about one-third of a mile)

Explanation:

lol its above

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Martin Luther believed that
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

King led a nonviolent movement in the late 1950's and '60s to achieve legal equality for African-Americans in the United States. While others were advocating for freedom by “any means necessary,” including violence, Martin Luther King, Jr.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is true of the council-manager form of city government? The city manager carries out the council's polici
    5·1 answer
  • How my John Locke have argued that the British government broke it social contract with its American colonists
    8·1 answer
  • What can you learn from lodge speech about the various responses of senators to the treaty of versailles and the league of natio
    15·2 answers
  • IF YOU JUST WANT THE POINTS I WIIIIIILLLLLLLL REPORT UUUUUUUUU
    15·2 answers
  • The railroad caused the development of what georgia city? A) augusta b) marietta c) atlanta d) savannah
    15·2 answers
  • Need to be answer asAP
    11·2 answers
  • In colonial governments, what were the council and the assembly patterned after?
    8·1 answer
  • What are the contributions of the Byzantine empire
    5·1 answer
  • Should any person or government have absolute power?
    15·2 answers
  • What does nonviolent resistance call for, according to Gandhi?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!