I believe the answer is a. They do not work hard enough.
Hope that helps!
Answer:
3). All of the above.
Explanation:
Cultural relativism is demonstrated as the concept associated with determining the meaning or understanding of social norms, beliefs, ideas, or practices in their particular cultural context relatively.
As per the question, all the given options correctly exemplify the reasons for which Rachel doubting the truth of cultural relativism. 'It rests on invalid argument' as cultural relativism prevents an individual from judging a specific social norm morally or ethically as per the standards but rather views in a defined context. 'Implausible consequences' that it brings would include 'conflicts aroused by disagreement between various social norms'(and not following the moral standards). 'The cultural disagreement' would be the product of this conflict which would not be that significant as it has not room for ethics and moral standards of values and judgments. Thus, <u>all the options</u> are correct.
I think D if not that then A
Please note that the option indicated are all types of text structure or organizational patterns for writing a speech.
<h3>What are Organizational Patterns for Writing a Speech?</h3>
It is to be noted that the general answer provided is due to incomplete information.
Organizational Patterns of speech writing are various patterns that can be adopted when an orator wants to prepare their speech.
The chronological order pattern for example, is best used when a topic involves a lot of history and will be better understood when presented according to the various time frames in which such events occurred.
See the link below for more about Organization Patters of Speech Writing:
brainly.com/question/3588488
Answer:
1/ The author portrays that the reader must vote.
2/the author says if you love your country you should vote.
3/the author says that if the world is to get better you should vote.
Explanation:
