A dialogue should be interesting rather than boring.
i hope this helps :)
The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
Explanation:
Take 2 of these
“It's never too late to learn.” ...
“It's ok if I fail, at least I learned something.” ...
“I appreciate constructive criticism.” ...
“I can always improve at something if I try.” ...
“I model my work after others who have been successful in the past.” ...
“What can I do better next time to make this work?”
I would love to answer this question but it looks like you need to attach a passage to answer this question. Btw the other answer that other person gave you was just to get points there is no file.
