The contributions of the Gupta's Empire in the field of Medicine are as follows:
<em>They build hospitals called The Charaka Samhita and the Sushruta Samhita;</em>
<em></em>
Gupta era had the knowledge of chemistry and they even practiced it by making use of Mercury and Iron in treatment of patients;
The Doctors had the knowledge of operations and conducted operations when one was needed;
They have the knowledge of vaccinations.
Explanation:
Gupta Empire Medicines: The Gupta Empire period was popular for several reasons. One of the reasons was the advancement achieved by the Gupta’s in the field of medicine. This was one of the divisions of sciences. Many new developments were brought about in the medical area such as the under-listed achievements:
<em>The Charaka Samhita and the Sushruta Samhita: </em>They were the significant works of medicine. There were hospitals established during the Gupta period where sick were properly taken care of.
During the period of the Gupta dynasty, there was the usage of mercury and iron in treatment of patience. The use of these materials indicates the fact that the people belonging to the Gupta era had the knowledge of chemistry and they even practiced it.
The doctors during that time were aware of operations and also knew how to conduct one in case it is required.
It is also believed that the Gupta people had the knowledge of vaccinations.
<em></em>
Note:<em> Attached is the picture of Gupta era Medicine.</em>
<span>C. Great Britain industrialized before either the United States or Japan great Britain was the first country where industrialization took roots. The rise of urban areas and cottage industries in urban areas, as well as discovery of coal and political stability in England contributed to the rise of Britain as an early industrial society. </span>
"<span>C. It is one of the earliest surviving lists of laws from the early civilizations" is the best option from the list, since it was the first set of laws that took into account the rights of individual citizens. </span>
That statement IS arguable because not everyone would agree and also NOT defensible since theres no proof to back it up with, so the answer would be (D)