In law, a summary judgment (also judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition) is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Such a judgment may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case. Hope this helps
The correct answer is C) it argued that Puritans admitted their own mistakes and tried to make up for them, which is a value the author believes Americans still practice today.
Paragraph 7 contributes to the development of ideas in the excerpt Puritan laws and characters in the following way: "it argued that Puritans admitted their own mistakes and tried to make up for them, which is a value the author believes Americans still practice today."
In paragraph 7, the author describes how Puritans were intolerant, but not as intolerant as the English. He said they were devoted to duty, fear of God, loved liberty, and hated tyranny. The author says that Puritans killed some Quakers buy confessed their mistake by repealing their own law.
The other options of the question were A) it explains how, despite their rigid laws and character, Puritans had some positive characteristics and should be viewed favorably in American history. B) it points out that Puritans were more open-minded than other European settlers. D) It emphasizes the Puritan's mistakes such as executing innocent Quakers.
Yes
This is because of the separation of powers principle that is enshrined in the constitution. By dividing power between the various branches, it ensures that no branch becomes too powerful the extent of becoming tyrannical. Each arm also acts to check the power of the other
Answer:
I think the answer is three: people are required to care for those around them.
Explanation:
I hope this helps :)