1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svet_ta [14]
3 years ago
8

What was the impact of Reagan's firing the air traffic controllers? A. Air safety improved significantly after the controllers w

ere replaced. B. Flight disasters increased, frightening people away from air travel. C. Labor unions deteriorated as employers fired striking workers and replaced them. D. The Air Traffic Controllers Organization regrouped and became stronger.
History
1 answer:
Dmitrij [34]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

C. Labor unions deteriorated as employers fired striking workers and replaced them.

Explanation:

The Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization(PATCO )was a United States trade union that was responsible for the welfare of aviation workers.

An illegal strike in August 3, 1981 occurred, seeking better working conditions such as reduced 32-hour work week and a $10,000 pay increase.

President Reagan fired all the aviation staffs and new set of people were trained and hired.

You might be interested in
Who founded the USSR? <br> Lenin<br> Nicholas II <br> Trotsky <br> Stalin
likoan [24]

Answer:

Vladimir Lenin

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What was the effect of all three Arab-Israeli Wars?
MrMuchimi

Answer:

Option: B. Israel gained land, while Arab nations lost land

Explanation:

There were many Arab-Israeli Wars since 1948 was a conflict between Israeli and Arab forces. The Arab-Israeli War broke out when the declaration of the state of Israel in 1948 after taking land from Palestine. The Balfour Declaration supported the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. The Jews accepted the plan but the Arabs did not. A war took place in which Isreal gained land from Palastine while Arab lost some of their lands.

4 0
3 years ago
What did the events of 1956 in eastern europe teach russian government officials? that the u.s. would use force in defending ant
Goryan [66]
The correct answer is <span>that they had to grant leeway for the adoption of some domestic reforms inside east european countries

Although there were numerous protests, riots, coups, and similar things, they were mostly stopped by the Soviet Union using the power of the military. This victory was difficult however and they understood that without giving satellite states some leeway that they would face numerous other problems in state governing.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)
soldi70 [24.7K]

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Triple Alliance and Triple Entente were formed through the signing of
Nataliya [291]

Answer: Treaties

Explanation:

During the build-up to WW1, countries in Europe formed alliances to protect themselves in case war broke out.

They formed these alliances by signing treaties amongst themselves.

The Triple Alliance was formed from a Treaty between Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy while the Triple Entente was as a result of a Treaty between Britain, France and Russia.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the significance of the massacre at wounded knee?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the attitude of the Medieval Period/Early Renaissance Period Catholic Church toward the use of musical instruments in w
    6·1 answer
  • Why was it that Iberians (Portuguese and Spanish) were the first to engage in the globe-spanning explorations of the late 15th a
    12·1 answer
  • This statement contradicts Leahy's opinion. Leahy
    14·1 answer
  • which of the following is not associated with the war of 1812 a]the battle of new orleans b]'the star spangled banner' c}the che
    8·2 answers
  • Pls help
    5·2 answers
  • What was the legacy of the Cold War in Guatemala, Cuba, and Chile over the long term?
    15·1 answer
  • Nazi leaders used kristallnacht to their advantage by
    12·1 answer
  • This tragic event in New York City in 1911, led to the horrific deaths of nearly 150 people, mostly young immigrant women who co
    13·1 answer
  • What is tribal sovereignty?​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!