Answer:
<span> 1) If a producer can provide cable service more cheaply than another producer, it is an</span> absolute advantage.<span>
2) If a producer can produce salads while giving up fewer opportunities to make sandwiches than another producer, it is a</span> comparative advantage.
3) If a producer can create more car parts than another producer does, using the same number of resources, the price per unit is cheaper and it is an absolute advantage.
Absolute advantage<span> is the ability of a person, a country, company or region to produce a good or service at a cheaper price per unit than another entity producing the same good or service.</span>
Comparative advantage<span> is the ability of a person, a country, company or region to produce a specific good or service more efficiently (lower opportunity cost) than another entity to produce the same good or service.</span>
Here, we are decide the best option between making the part or buying the part.
a. Make or Buy Analysis
Particulars Make amount Buy amount
Direct Materials $4.50
Direct Labor $1.00
Overhead (80% of Direct Labor) $0.80
Cost to buy <u> </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost per unit <u>$5.70 </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost Difference = $5.70 - $4.70
Cost Difference = $1.00
Therefore, the cost difference of making amount over buying amount is $1.00.
b. Because of the difference, Beto should buy the part because its cost is lesser than to make the part.
Therefore, the buying of the part is the best decision.
See similar solution about Analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/23287319</em>
Answer:
Fraud.
Explanation:
Fraud is defined as intentional misrepresentation aimed at gaining unlawful advantage or to deprive a victim of a legal right.
In civil law the victim can file for recovery of money, while in criminal law the fraud perpetrator may be committed to prison.
Lipstik intentionally mislabels its packaged products to conceal a defect, and gains unfair advantage by selling these defective goods to customers. Mikayla buys the lipstick based on the misrepresented information on the label and gets injured.
Answer:
Present value of interest is $5,062 and future value is $5,796
Explanation:
The formula for finding the Present value of the interest reported as revenue is calculated as under:
Present Value of $40,000 receivable in 2 years = $40,000 / (1+7%)^2
Present Value of $40,000 receivable in 2 years = $34,938
The difference of the future value receivable and present value of the future amount receivable is the interest's present value which is given as under:
Interest Present value = $40,000 - $34,938 = $5,062
Using the compounding formula, the future value of the interest that will be recorded in the financial statement will be = $5,062 * (1 + 7%)^2 years
Future value of interest = $5796
Answer:
It is given that in an oligopolistic market, there are at first five firms. At the point when the quantity of fums diminishes to three, it implies that the all out yield will likewise decrease. It is on the grounds that, all the makers are delivering separated items. The inventory of merchandise won't increment in light of the fact that the makers would have expanded the creation before, if that was conceivable. Hence, the balance amount will fall and in view of decrease in amount, cost will increase.
Thus, equilibrium price will likely <u>increase</u> and the equilibrium quantity will likely <u>decrease.</u>
