Could you please take a better photo of the text?:)
Answer:
Quantity is how much you have of something. Quality is how good something is. It means that they are not the same. Just because you have more of something doesn't mean it's better. Example: There are McDonalds everywhere. McDonalds is not quality food, but it is quantity since there's so many. Chick-fil-a is not everywhere. There's not as many as McDonalds. Chick-fil-a is quality, and not quantity.
Explanation:
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Write your original thesis that makes a significant claim about the story. Refer to the Group Discussion Overview for additional information.
"The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County"
Answer:
"The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County" was written by Mark Twain in 1865, being one of the most influential and important works in American literature, in addition to being the work that claimed the name of Mark Twain as an authority on national literature, being a of his most influential and best-known works. All this importance justifies the relevance of this work until today, being mentioned in several literature courses, besides being a mandatory reading by high school and elementary students.
Explanation:
The thesis statement is a statement that shows additional information that justifies the debate, an analysis, a speech and even an essay on a certain topic. In summary, a Thesis statement shows the importance of the topic being exposed and why it is important and relevant that it is spoken and discussed.
Answer:
The opening text to EVEREST explains the difficulty of climbing Mt. Everest but then talks about how expeditions are set up to held people reach the summit. This film tells the true story of one such expedition in 1996 where the climbers ran into a disastrous storm with tragic results.
EVEREST is a very grim, depressing and rather unpleasant movie that I really wish was better. I had high hopes going into the film but sadly there are all sorts of problems that overshadow what great qualities that are on display. I think the biggest problem is the opening hour where we get to know the characters and like a lot of the disaster movies from the 1970s these scenes are all too familiar and they really don't add much. I think the direction of Baltasar Kormakur could have handled these scenes much better or at least added a bit of energy to them.
The film kicks into high gear once the climb actually starts and once the storm hits. The greatest aspect to the film is the terrific cinematography, which is just downright beautiful and at times breath-taking. Even greater is the fact that it really does show you the dangers of making such a climb and I think the one thing the film does brilliantly is show you what a remarkable accomplishment it would be to reach the top of the mountain. I've seen several documentaries on Everest but this movie really does a remarkable job at showing how difficult the climb would be.
The performances are all very good. Jason Clarke, Jake Gyllenhaal, Emily Watson, Keira Knightley and Josh Brolin are all very good in their roles. All of the roles are rather small but it's easy to see what would attract them to such a project. The film also benefits from being technically very good with the score, the editing, sound effects and various other effects coming across quite good.
As I said, the first hour of the film is rather sluggish and I think the overall pacing is just off. The film features some intense scenes of action and peril but as I said the overall feel is just so depressing and unpleasant that I really wouldn't recommend the movie to people. I really wish the film was better but in the end it falls well short of being a good movie.
Explanation:
