If members of Congress were truly delegates for their area then each would have continuous contact with their district. For Senators this would be more difficult as there are only 2 per state and for larger states this would require communicating with millions of people across many miles of land to have face-to-face contact. House Representatives are based on the population of a state and therefore House districts are smaller and easier to manage. Currently they best represent the idea of a delegate to the federal government as they are more able to communicate with their district. With advancements in technology the communication piece is now easier to accomplish. However, as delegates they should also offer more voting on issues they will be voting on in Congress. These votes or polling would truly give the representative a delegate role, if they listen and vote based on majority polling.
They never did the Native American Mashantucket Pequot still own it, but now they get the money for the land development.
South Carolina, It's owned by the tribes there.
Answer: IDK
Explanation: This does not tell what is not a source of income.
The answer is C, "the Federal Open Market Committee can act almost immediately."
The answer to the question above is the wealthy land owners.
The repeal of the British corn laws in 1846 was most strongly opposes by the wealthy land owners. The corn laws was a law enforced in Great Britain in which tariffs and other trade restriction on imported food and grains, particularly the corn.
