Answer:
A) It attacked Canada
Explanation:
The War of 1812 began in June of 1812. It was fought directly in the North (with Canada), in the East (with the British, when the British came to the United States) and with the Spanish, allied with Britain, in Florida and the West.
A) The United States attacked Canada in July of 1812 under General William Hull.
B) The US attacked Florida later on during the war.
C) The United States only attacked Britain once in the late 1700s.
D) The United States and France only fought in the late 1700s.
It showed us the harmful effects of racism through the treatment of Jewish people in concentration camps in Germany.
Mercantilism is the belief in benifits and capitalism is the individual making profit from the working
Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
