They depended on the monsoons.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Hi!
People who act in accordance with Gibb's category of equality communicate that while they may have greater talent in some areas, all have just as much worth as human beings.
The correct answer here would be assimilation. assimilation<span> is the process in which a minority group or culture comes to resemble those of a dominant group.</span> This is a process or another part of adaptation involves changing or altering our existing schemas in light of new information.
