I think it’s ‘in conclusion’ because you say that when you’re finished with saying what you needed to say, so therefore I don’t think that’s be a good phrase to use when you’re trying to live from one thing to another
Well, you can analyze the poem any way you want, poetry is open to everyone's interpretation. I believe that when the poet, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, compares love to "childhood's faith," she wants to show the innocence of that love. Children have blind faith in their parents, friends, etc. and can be quite naive, the way her love is as well. However, she can also be talking about the power of her love, because a child's faith is unbreakable - it is so strong, just as much as her love. Hope this helps!
Water. it will be water because water or some kind of liquid is the only thing that will evaporate.
Shakespeare is most likely to use the word arming instead of providing, because the word sounded more tough, it sounded like more protective. Hopefully this helps. Plze mark me brainiest:)
